Should you invest differently given the impending retirement of tens of millions of baby boomers? This is a question I’ve received from advisors and investors in recent weeks, and one which, quite frankly, I’ve given little thought to throughout the financial crisis. (It always seemed like a topic of conversation when the Dow was at 14,000 and not at 7,000.)
This comment on Steve Utkus’ recent post about retirement struck a major chord with me:
“Our children’s incomes are not increasing, and they have their own children to support, let alone saving for their own retirement. No one is to blame or is being stingy; we simply must plan for and take charge of our own later years.”
The national debate on health reform has me thinking about a particular angle of the question: paying for health care in retirement. Let’s put aside for the moment long-term care costs (i.e., nursing homes) and focus on regular medical care—doctors’ bills, hospital fees, drugs, and so forth.
Each year in August we publish a compendium of statistics about 401(k) plans administered at Vanguard. As the report covers over 3 million American participants, it often generates a lot of interest from the media, policymakers, consultants, and employers. (You’re certainly welcome to read the entire book—please do!—but for the CliffsNotes version, just take a look at the executive summary.)
I recently participated in a live webcast attended by a number of Vanguard retirement plan participants. The topic was retirement investing, and questions came fast and furious. We answered as many as we could in our allotted 30 minutes.
One question we didn’t get to: What are the plusses and minuses of keeping money in a 401(k), as opposed to rolling over to an IRA? It’s unfortunate that we didn’t have time to discuss this, as it’s an important question, and the answer can vary depending on what’s going on in your life.
