Just saw this—Linda Stern punches holes in some of the more common misconceptions about retirement:
Stern Advice: Busting retirement myths
What she has to say lines up well with my own observations and thoughts. What about you?
Just saw this—Linda Stern punches holes in some of the more common misconceptions about retirement:
Stern Advice: Busting retirement myths
What she has to say lines up well with my own observations and thoughts. What about you?
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal tells a sad tale of retirement preparedness: The typical pre-retiree baby boomer has less than one-quarter of what he or she needs in a 401(k) plan to retire.
In my view, this assessment is entirely too bleak. As I’ve noted previously, estimating retirement readiness for an entire generation is a difficult task, and the result is sensitive to the assumptions used. Moreover, the issue isn’t a black-and-white question—who’s ready, who isn’t?—but one of degree.
In my February 4 post, I complained about what I perceived as mischaracterization of the performance of target date funds because of reporting that focused on the spectacularly poor results of a few small, unusual outlying target date funds (TDFs).
Well, last week a Government Accountability Office report on TDFs was released, and I’m starting to get a whiff of similarly slanted reporting on a different subject: accusations that these funds are charging “outrageous fees.”
With a new year well underway, at Vanguard our attention is turning to IRAs, 401(k)s, and tax planning. This year, I, like a lot of others, seem to have Roth IRAs on the brain.
In my January 25 post, I looked at two tactical retirement issues: improving savings rates and evaluating portfolio risk levels. In this post, I’ll wrap up with three additional ideas.