Your 401(k): Nest egg or slush fund?
One of our readers recently asked about Vanguard’s view on 401(k) loans.
As you might know if you’ve poked around Vanguard.com, we generally frown upon retirement plan loans, to put it mildly. In fact, Vanguard’s intranet for employees recently featured an article cautioning us against borrowing from our own retirement accounts.
Titled “He [or she] that goes a borrowing goes a sorrowing,” the article noted that Benjamin Franklin’s favored method for making difficult decisions was to put together “a side-by-side list of the reasons for and the reasons against a certain course of action.” To help out, the article offered a list of “negative consequences of taking a loan.” It may have been a bit over the top, but I basically agree that retirement plan loans can be misused. There is always a cost to borrowing, and with plan loans there are some risks.
You shouldn’t borrow from your retirement plan—or from anywhere else, in general—unless you really have to, in order to pay for something that is a necessity. In this category I’d include a house, a higher education, and perhaps a (first) automobile. I’d also include large unexpected medical bills, or the money required to deal with a true family emergency. But I think you have to think twice about borrowing anywhere (banks, credit cards, or your retirement savings) to fund things that you don’t absolutely need. In my view, an overeagerness to borrow on the part of consumers was a major driver in the financial crisis we’re now going through.
But now to the neglected potential benefits of a 401(k) loan.
If you’re in a position in which you need a loan for a real necessity, then it’s totally appropriate to consider borrowing from your 401(k). The essential advantage of a plan loan is that instead of paying interest to a third party, you pay it to yourself, so the cost of the loan is whatever administrative fees you pay plus any lost return on the assets that you’ve borrowed. In most circumstances—particularly if you don’t have stellar credit—this means 401(k) loans have lower total costs than the alternatives.
(Another cost: The interest you owe on your plan loan is paid back to your account with after-tax dollars, and when you withdraw it in retirement, you’ll pay tax again. But this is a very minor cost, and it’s not true, as is sometimes claimed, that the entire loan amount is “taxed twice”—just the interest payments.)
There are some additional risks to a plan loan. A big one is that you could wind up leaving your employer before you repay the loan. In a 401(k) plan, if this happens, you must immediately pay back the loan, or it will be considered a taxable distribution—in which case you’ll owe taxes on the loan proceeds, plus any applicable tax penalties if it’s an early distribution (i.e., if you are younger than 59½). This can make a cash-crunch situation even worse, so you need to be very sure you’re going to stay at your employer long enough to repay the loan.
In addition, some borrowers defer new contributions into their 401(k) plans while they repay their loans. This is a permanent loss of an opportunity to save on taxes on your retirement assets, and can be a significant disadvantage later. But if you have to stop contributing to your 401(k) in order to repay a plan loan, presumably you’d also have to stop contributing to make payments on an alternative loan outside the plan. This isn’t a reason to choose an alternative loan over a 401(k) loan—it’s just another reason not to borrow at all in the first place.
Vanguard.com has a neat plan loan calculator that will show you the estimated cost of a plan loan (as well as the cost of an alternative loan). The tool emphasizes the cost of the loan in terms of the investment returns you’d potentially give up. It’s very useful information, but you do need to be careful in interpreting it. The rate of return you assume on your plan assets should line up with what you think you’d receive if you took little or no investment risk (think money market account).
It’s simply not true that giving up stocks in your retirement plan in exchange for a loan will result in a certain loss in the future value of your plan. Ask anyone who borrowed against the stock portion of their plan assets in early 2008. They’re likely to be quite happy that, thanks to the loan, their plan balance won’t fully reflect recent stock market losses. This is just the flip side of a more obvious fact: Borrowing outside the plan at a fixed rate in order to invest in stocks inside the plan does not produce a certain profit. Doing the reverse doesn’t create a certain loss, either. So, use a money market rate in estimating the “return give up” cost of the loan.
With a money market rate of interest as a baseline, you’ll generally see that a plan loan can make very good financial sense if you are in extreme circumstances and absolutely have to borrow. But if you aren’t in such a situation, remember there are always significant costs to borrowing, no matter what the source. Paying cash up-front is generally always the cheapest way to obtain the things you want in life. Don’t treat your retirement plan as a slush fund!
Notes:
- All investments are subject to risk.
- When taking withdrawals from an IRA before age 59½, you may have to pay ordinary income tax plus a 10% federal penalty tax.





From reading this article, it sounds like borrowed 401k funds do not remain invested. Hence borrowing against the 401k is not a way to create leverage. However, I am confused about what happens to the account balance while the money is borrowed. I can understand some reasonable administrative costs, but why would I charge myself interest on my own loan?
I am assuming that a loan taken just before the recent stock market drop would be advantations in two ways: you are selling high and buying low (loan repayment).
Is this view incorrect?
The most important comment you made was to avoid debt if at all possible. I believe this is critical now, and while it will hurt economic activity in general, the best thing for most folks to do with any extra money is pay off whatever debt they have.
John,
Thanks for providing to us a “global view” when it comes to borrowing from a 401K, which for most of us has been termed a “forbidden” zone in which to delve. I have two questions.
First,could you elaborate more about the following premise about not being taxed twiced?
You state: “(Another cost: The interest you owe on your plan loan is paid back to your account with after-tax dollars, and when you withdraw it in retirement, you’ll pay tax again. But this is a very minor cost, and it’s not true, as is sometimes claimed, that the entire loan amount is “taxed twice”—just the interest payments.)”
I need further clarification, though, for most, this might be a simple concept.
Secondly, for those of us who have 403b’s at Vanguard, how would our situation differ, if any, from those who have 401K’s.
John:
Your points are well taken. I borrowed from my 401K a few years back to buy a home (I thought all was safe), but the unforseen happened and my health forced me to change jobs. It was a struggle to come up with the funds to pay back the loan so I wouldn’t have a tax and penalty. This on top of all the health issues proved to be a very challenging time for me. Great advice - find another way to do it.
What also has worked well for me is to invest in a ROTH IRA for savings that may be needed for life’s emergencies. I treat it as a bill and pay it every month. This helped establish my “E” fund which I have not had to use - but is there if needed and my 401K continues to grow as I also contribute to it and have seen progress for my retirement.
I would NEVER borrow against my retirement accounts (any of them).They are earmarked for retirement, after all. For the “necessities” you mention above (a house, higher education), separate investment/savings account are available. For medical bills that can’t come out of cash flow and other emergencies, we have “emergency funds.” Of course, to even begin to accumulate all of these savings, people first have to avoid/pay off all debt. Debt is the enemy of wealth.
Hey, ok, I get it, I guess - but does this really work?
I guess that means no 401k loan to buy a macbook.. dreamsquasher
In an ideal world, none of us would ever need to borrow at all. However, life is never ideal.
We are considering borrowing to pay off a partnership loan in the business, hence little risk of leaving the job. We would be able to keep paying the usual contribution while paying off the loan. Are continued contributions possible?